Skip to content

Geoff Banks Online Reports

Geoff Banks Online Reports

Lack of star horses is hurting racing (The Times 10/8/18)

Lack of star horses is hurting racing

Mark Souster, Racing Writer

The viewing figures for ITV’s coverage of Glorious Goodwood showed a slight increase on last year which is a positive sign. The most watched race was the Sussex Stakes last Wednesday won by Lightning Spear under a masterful ride by Oisin Murphy with a peak figure of 871,000.

But a sober analysis of the number of viewers for the big meetings across the year suggest that while the trend is lightly upward, the figures are probably not what either ITV racing or the sport itself might have been hoping for when they won the rights and a four-year contract at the start of last season. Audiences of 1.5 million were being talked about over time.

The averages for Royal Ascot this year, which was shown on ITV1 for four of the five days, were down from 867,000 in 2017 to 721,000. The reason cited was the impact of the World Cup. The Grand National last year was disappointing and that was put down to the unseasonably warm weather. Comparisons are still being made with the figures Channel 4 attracted in the final year of its contract in 2016. But how much longer that can be sustained is a moot point. At some stage ITV has to move on from that.

Lightning Spear’s victory in the Qatar Sussex Stakes at Goodwood attracted a TV audience of 871,000
Lightning Spear’s victory in the Qatar Sussex Stakes at Goodwood attracted a TV audience of 871,000Adam Davy/PA Wire

Let me stress that the fact viewing expectations have not been realised is nothing to do with ITV’s coverage. It is universally agreed that it is outstanding, with Royal Ascot a brilliant yardstick. The BAFTA for the Grand National output was no more than the channel deserved. The broadcaster has managed to successfully tread the fine line between satisfying the traditional audience but making racing far more accessible. The presentation teams and pundits work extremely well together, editorially it hits the mark every week.

So what might be the reason that audiences have not increased as markedly as one might have anticipated via the powerful terrestrial platform that ITV offers? Well I am grateful for Geoff Banks, the bookmaker and a controversial character who is not afraid to speak the truth to crystalise some thoughts I had had on this subject.

In essence sport is about competition, about duels, about personalities, about identities which an audience and the public at large can latch on to, relate to and become entwined in the narrative. Football, Wimbledon and the Six Nations for example draw in viewers in the many millions. Flat racing does not, nor has it had, a superstar that gripped the imagination since Frankel who admittedly was a freak of nature.

Part of the reason identified by Banks and with which I concur is the lack of star turns, or at least star turns who do not have a shelf life beyond two seasons before unceremoniously being retired and sent off to stud. Flat racing is now more a business than a sport. It is increasingly a means to an end whereby fabulously wealthy individuals who invest massive sums into the sport seek to make a return on their investment in breeding. Not only are their horses retired too young but to preserve their values during their all too short careers, often trainers at the behest of owners do their best to avoid head-to-head confrontations.

This is what Banks wrote in his most recent blog, which to my mind went to the heart of the problem. “Racing’s number one star [Frankel] retired too young, and well before he needed to,” Banks said. “Buy a ticket for Barcelona, and you’ll see Messi. Buy a ticket for racing each season, it’s unlikely the new audience we are so desperate to attract has heard of any of the performers.

“Frankel, an iconic racehorse, literally put bums on seats. He retired, let’s not forget as a four-year old! Did he have any nuts by the time he was four? Quite literally his stud value to Juddmonte far exceeded what he could earn on the track. Simple commerce you say?

“Except that Khalid Abdullah [his owner] is one of racing’s billionaires. Along with Godolphin, Coolmore, and [Anthony] Oppenheimer. They simply don’t need the money. It’s therefore a paradox they choose to send their ponies to service mares at three and four years of age.

“And whilst they race, as fans we are treated to the monthly pantomime of will they, won’t they show up. It’s nothing new to see horses openly avoid competition. Because it makes more commercial sense to the afore-mentioned billionaires apparently to send them to stud all with the grand title of “the best I’ve ever owned”.

“Athletes, notably human ones, constantly perform with injuries, knocks and niggles. Our best horses appear so wrapped in cotton wool, the slightest inflammation, or let’s admit it, the presence of another star suddenly turning up in the field, is enough to see them defect. If you think they don’t avoid meaningful opposition, you don’t understand breeding.”

His overarching conclusion is difficult to disagree with too. “Unless the authorities in charge of racing on both sides of the Irish Sea do something about arresting the flow of top horses to stud, the only thing that will keep racing going is the beer tent. The viewing figures are telling us to pull our socks up as a sport, because we cannot [even] best [repeat showings] of Columbo.”

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Related

Unknown's avatar

Author: Geoff Banks Online

UK's Leading Independent Bookmaker. We pay our tax and Levy to British Racing as an Approved Betting Partner. And no begging a proper bet here, large or small stakers welcome! Text, phone, APP or website. Private Client Wagering at its best. :) View all posts by Geoff Banks Online

Unknown's avatarAuthor Geoff Banks OnlinePosted on August 10, 2018August 11, 2018Categories View From The Ring

One thought on “Lack of star horses is hurting racing (The Times 10/8/18)”

  1. Mart thornton's avatar Mart thornton says:
    August 12, 2018 at 21:08

    Cannot disagree but then the bookmakers and punters will have to pay more than they are currently doing. Doesn’t matter how rich you are you will take the best commercial route. Triple betting duty and then we may see a shift.

    LikeLike

    Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: The Defection Of Talent
Next Next post: A tale of two Rings..

Recent Posts

  • The harm figures don’t hold, and neither does the man citing them Will Prochaska has written in PoliticsHome (funded rag) that Britain’s gambling market has left “millions of people harmed, communities held back, high streets blighted”. Every part of that sentence is contestable, and the numbers underneath it do not survive scrutiny. Even in the world of Mary a Whitehouse types there ought to be a grain of evidenceThe absurd claim that millions are harmedThe figure derives entirely from the Gambling Survey for Great Britain. Regulus Partners has shown the GSGB overstates participation in some gambling activities by as much as 728 per cent. Its problem gambling estimate of 2.7 per cent is around seven times the 0.4 per cent NHS figure that the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities itself used. Where is the documented rise in actual problem gambling rates to support his fantasies? To accept it, you must also accept that every official gambling statistic produced over seventeen years was substantially wrong, that the NHS has serially misreported the prevalence of health disorders generally, and that audited operator customer data is incorrect.The Commission’s own independent reviewer, Professor Sturgis, found the survey may substantially overstate both gambling and gambling harm errrr. The Commission’s counter-evidence on response bias was debunked by Sturgis and then suppressed, (commission has group 1 form for surpression of inconvenient information) emerging only under Freedom of Information. Its lead advisor, Professor Wardle, had already warned that the dominant effect was over-reporting within the GSGB rather than under-reporting elsewhere. The Commission has conceded the survey’s principal value may lie in trend analysis rather than measuring prevalence.Applied consistently to the same dataset, the methodology makes roughly one million National Lottery customers problem gamblers, at a cost exceeding £6.2 billion.That is the arithmetic on which the harm campaign rests.The claim that high streets are blightedBetting shop numbers have fallen from around 8,995 in 2015 to 5,825 in 2025. The Gambling Commission has confirmed roughly 3,000 closures since 2019 and more than 15,000 jobs lost. Adult Gaming Centres are fewer than they were in 2012 and have not changed materially in a decade.There is no proliferation. There is a contraction, and the regulator has said so publicly.Who is making this argument? Will Prochaska is Director of the Coalition to End Gambling Ads and previously led Gambling with Lives. CEGA states on its own website that it is funded by Las Vegas residing Derek Webb. You know him eh? The same declaration appears in his competing interests statement in the BMJ.Derek Webb made his money inventing casino table games, including three card poker. His campaigning began when he found his game running on fixed odds betting terminals without royalties. He has said publicly that instead of suing he funded a campaign to make his point. He then spent around £3 million making those machines commercially unviable through regulation. He has since given substantial sums to the Labour Party, including £750,000 in 2024 and £300,000 in 2023.So the man calling for the end of gambling advertising is funded by a man who profited from casino gaming and turned to UK regulation after a commercial dispute.That matters for the  Prochaska blurb. He cites the Social Market Foundation as ‘independent corroboration’ of his economic case. The SMF is also funded by Derek Webb! He is not citing external support. He’s one of Webb’s boys. In the clubHis own organisation’s website relies on the OHID estimate of gambling-related deaths in England. That is the same OHID analysis the Office for Statistics Regulation has said cannot be used to support causal claims, and which OHID’s own Director-General has stepped back from. Because it’s almost entirely a work of fiction. None of this is hidden. CEGA declares its funding openly. The problem is not secrecy. It is that a campaign funded by one man keeps citing itself as evidence, and Parliament keeps treating it as an excuse to be worthy. September 10, 2026
  • Gambling as a public health issue? September 2, 2026
  • The Gambling Commission Is About to Vote Itself More Power. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? 🎰💀 May 7, 2026
  • GamScore Wants to Save You From Yourself. By Reading Your Bank Statement. Three Times a Day. 🏦👀 May 7, 2026
  • THE RIGHT TO BET April 12, 2026

Recent Comments

Unknown's avatarSpeed Kills! – Geoff… on Speed Kills!
Ellis's avatarEllis on Open Letter To Jenny Williams…
Donovan Leech's avatarDonovan Leech on it’s ok to lie- in a goo…
Ewan Raffan's avatarEwan Raffan on it’s ok to lie- in a goo…
Geoff Banks Online's avatarGeoff Banks Online on Racing or Lorraine?
My Tweets
Geoff Banks Online Reports Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Geoff Banks Online Reports
    • Join 79 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Geoff Banks Online Reports
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d